From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38429 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OKB2w-0001lJ-0h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 10:05:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OKB2r-0000Ft-5p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 10:05:21 -0400 Received: from are.twiddle.net ([75.149.56.221]:45625) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OKB2r-0000FU-0L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 10:05:17 -0400 Message-ID: <4C07B699.2060504@twiddle.net> Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 07:05:13 -0700 From: Richard Henderson MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4C0692F2.9060203@twiddle.net> <201006030554.38803.paul@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <201006030554.38803.paul@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Unposted reserved_va patch List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paul Brook Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 06/02/2010 09:54 PM, Paul Brook wrote: > Hmm, maybe. My reasoning was that this is consistent with the current behavior > of the ELF loader. If you specify -G then the target application will be > splatted at that address, regardless of whether it's already used by the host. Well, sort-of. Before you removed PAGE_RESERVED we'd yield a very cryptic error message about mmap failed and exit. r~