From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52750 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OKbgL-0004qf-21
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 14:31:50 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <rth@twiddle.net>) id 1OKbgJ-0003aL-Rm
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 14:31:48 -0400
Received: from are.twiddle.net ([75.149.56.221]:60543)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <rth@twiddle.net>) id 1OKbgJ-0003aA-Fl
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 14:31:47 -0400
Message-ID: <4C094691.7090107@twiddle.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 11:31:45 -0700
From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/10] target-mips: add enum constants for
	various invocations of FOP
References: <1274717984-25887-1-git-send-email-froydnj@codesourcery.com>	<1274717984-25887-4-git-send-email-froydnj@codesourcery.com>	<4C093BBC.6060509@redhat.com>
	<20100604175050.GG19235@codesourcery.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100604175050.GG19235@codesourcery.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Nathan Froyd <froydnj@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>, aurelien@aurel32.net, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 06/04/2010 10:50 AM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> What's the benefit from declaring op1 as 'enum fopcode' or similar?

Debugging and self-documentation.



r~