From: Bob Breuer <breuerr@mc.net>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Artyom Tarasenko <atar4qemu@googlemail.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: option-rom (was cg14)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 15:25:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C0AB2B8.2080906@mc.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimTjVolNYSjlXAEP_EQkCp1x161cvme2nVK4UTW@mail.gmail.com>
Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
> <atar4qemu@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>>>>> 2010/5/27 Bob Breuer <breuerr@mc.net>:
>>>>> + /* DBRI (audio) */
>>>>> + cpu_register_physical_memory_offset(0xEE0001000ULL, 0x10000, bad_mem, 0xE0001000);
>>>>>
>>>> Please add a new DBRI device ;-).
>>>>
>>> Or maybe just a field in hwdef + empty_slot? :-)
>>>
>> Or actually don't bother at all. What is expected at 0xee0001000 is
>> not the DBRI device, but its FCode driver.
>> I wrote a stub, but don't see that it helps to boot except one has a
>> nice device name (
>>
>> Probing /obio at 2,0 cgfourteen
>> Probing /iommu@f,e0000000/sbus@f,e0001000 at f,0 espdma esp sd st
>> ledma le SUNW,bpp
>> Probing /iommu@f,e0000000/sbus@f,e0001000 at e,0 qemu,device-stub
>> Probing /iommu@f,e0000000/sbus@f,e0001000 at 0,0 Nothing there
>>
>> ) and switching off slot "e" probing is not necessary.
>>
>>
>> What would be nice is a generic '-option-rom' switch which would take
>> a rom address and rom file or contents
>> as params. Or do we have something like this? I mean for qemu-system-sparc.
>>
>
> Maybe SysBusDeviceInfo should have something similar to PCI .romfile
> field, or we should rather have a SBusDeviceInfo. That way ROM
> handling would be automatic.
>
With empty_slot SS-20 OBP accesses just 2 addresses for slot E:
0xEE0001000 - 8bit read (FCode)
0xEE0010000 - 32bit write (put DBRI into reset)
Did a little digging, slot E starts at 0xEE0000000 (0xE << 32 | slot <<
28). On my SS-20, the DBRI FCode is only 48 bytes which is then
mirrored every 64 bytes within at least the first 8K, and the actual
registers are at offset 64K with a reported length of 256 bytes.
Besides hooking up DBRI (empty_slot or not), I would propose the
following additions to the sun4m_hwdef structure so that the other
missing pieces can then be hooked up to empty_slot.
--- a/hw/sun4m.c
+++ b/hw/sun4m.c
@@ -98,6 +98,10 @@ struct sun4m_hwdef {
target_phys_addr_t serial_base, fd_base;
target_phys_addr_t afx_base, idreg_base, dma_base, esp_base, le_base;
target_phys_addr_t tcx_base, cs_base, apc_base, aux1_base, aux2_base;
+ target_phys_addr_t dbri_base, sx_base;
+ struct {
+ target_phys_addr_t reg_base, vram_base;
+ } vsimm[4];
target_phys_addr_t ecc_base;
uint32_t ecc_version;
uint8_t nvram_machine_id;
Also, looks like OpenBIOS would need some additional ranges added under
obio and sbus. From a SS-20:
ok cd /obio
ok .attributes
ranges 00000000 00000000 0000000f f1000000 01000000
00000001 00000000 00000000 90000000 04000000
00000002 00000000 00000000 9c000000 04000000
00000003 00000000 00000000 f0000000 04000000
00000004 00000000 00000000 fc000000 04000000
device_type hierarchical
name obio
ok cd /iommu/sbus
ok .attributes
clock-frequency 017d7840
scsi-initiator-id 00000007
burst-sizes 00f8007f
ranges 00000000 00000000 0000000e 00000000 10000000
00000001 00000000 0000000e 10000000 10000000
00000002 00000000 0000000e 20000000 10000000
00000003 00000000 0000000e 30000000 10000000
0000000e 00000000 0000000e e0000000 10000000
0000000f 00000000 0000000e f0000000 10000000
address ffeec000
reg 0000000f e0001000 00000020
slot-address-bits 0000001c
up-burst-sizes 0000003f
device_type hierarchical
name sbus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-05 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-04 17:40 [Qemu-devel] option-rom (was cg14) Artyom Tarasenko
2010-06-04 19:28 ` [Qemu-devel] " Blue Swirl
2010-06-05 20:25 ` Bob Breuer [this message]
2010-06-05 20:35 ` Blue Swirl
2010-06-05 23:10 ` [Qemu-devel] sun framebuffer selection (was option-rom) Bob Breuer
2010-06-06 7:32 ` [Qemu-devel] " Blue Swirl
2010-06-06 16:28 ` Artyom Tarasenko
2010-06-09 19:43 ` Blue Swirl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C0AB2B8.2080906@mc.net \
--to=breuerr@mc.net \
--cc=atar4qemu@googlemail.com \
--cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).