From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35433 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OLj8B-0007Ms-Oc
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 16:41:12 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1OLj8A-0005Dg-HX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 16:41:11 -0400
Received: from mail-iw0-f173.google.com ([209.85.214.173]:64199)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1OLj8A-0005D7-Ef
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 16:41:10 -0400
Received: by iwn41 with SMTP id 41so3966696iwn.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 13:41:07 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C0D5959.5010303@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 15:40:57 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] configure: add an option to disable vlans
References: <20100607150309.GA13369@redhat.com>
	<201006071716.31103.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<20100607161730.GB11177@redhat.com>
	<201006071742.56312.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<4C0D23B5.3050605@codemonkey.ws>
	<20100607192059.GA14490@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100607192059.GA14490@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 06/07/2010 02:21 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> So I see two ways to go forward: switch default value in my patch,
> or disable vlans unconditionally.
>    

The problem with disabling vlans unconditionally is that you break -net 
socket and -net dump.

If we can come up with an alternative way to do these things, I'm all 
for removing it.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Which will it be?
>
>    
>>> Paul
>>>
>>>
>>>