From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34704 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ONTpC-0007M3-Es for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 12:44:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONTp9-00073h-U0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 12:44:50 -0400 Received: from fmmailgate01.web.de ([217.72.192.221]:52764) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONTp9-00073L-H4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 12:44:47 -0400 Message-ID: <4C13B978.1000805@web.de> Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 18:44:40 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] configure: Fix evaluation of config-host.mak in create_config References: <4C12A375.6050201@web.de> <20100612115557.GK3008@ohm.aurel32.net> <4C137CA6.1020808@web.de> <20100612143758.GD1940@ohm.aurel32.net> In-Reply-To: <20100612143758.GD1940@ohm.aurel32.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig79B34989CD21532B6E1A0A27" Sender: jan.kiszka@web.de List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Aurelien Jarno Cc: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig79B34989CD21532B6E1A0A27 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 02:25:10PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Aurelien Jarno wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:58:29PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>> From: Jan Kiszka >>>> >>>> Only match on true dir variable assignments, avoid generating garbag= e >>>> due to the "# Configured with: ..." line which may contain "*dir=3D"= as >>>> well. >>> Wouldn't it be better to skip all lines starting with '#', as this >>> problem might happen again after some more changes? >>> >>> Or maybe we should do both. >> This is what the patch (implicitly) does. >=20 > Yes, but only for this line. What I mean is something more generic > like: >=20 > "#"*) # comment > continue > ;; >=20 IMO, that would only paper over suboptimally expressed patterns for the other line evaluations. Jan --------------enig79B34989CD21532B6E1A0A27 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkwTuXwACgkQitSsb3rl5xT0EwCgzMK78EHiNhO1SxgBMH0mnNnk hEUAn0QgcZiH6YxGQUNj/2HwXC3bL2e0 =ic9j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig79B34989CD21532B6E1A0A27--