From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52084 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ONUxx-0005U8-Eq
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:57:58 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1ONUxw-0008AF-87
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:57:57 -0400
Received: from mail-fx0-f45.google.com ([209.85.161.45]:59357)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1ONUxw-0008A4-04
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:57:56 -0400
Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so1785508fxm.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 10:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4C13CAA0.70606@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 19:57:52 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4C12A375.6050201@web.de>
	<20100612115557.GK3008@ohm.aurel32.net>	<4C137CA6.1020808@web.de>
	<20100612143758.GD1940@ohm.aurel32.net> <4C13B978.1000805@web.de>
In-Reply-To: <4C13B978.1000805@web.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] configure: Fix evaluation of
	config-host.mak in create_config
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>

On 06/12/2010 06:44 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Yes, but only for this line. What I mean is something more generic
>> like:
>>
>> "#"*) # comment
>>      continue
>>      ;;
>>
>
> IMO, that would only paper over suboptimally expressed patterns for the
> other line evaluations.

Agreed.  I like Jan's patch more.

Paolo