From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: "chrisw@redhat.com" <chrisw@redhat.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
"kraxel@redhat.com" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
"avi@redhat.com" <avi@redhat.com>,
Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 1/5] qdev: Create qdev_get_dev_path()
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:49:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C165DA5.70105@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1276533496.12015.191.camel@x201>
Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 18:00 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Alex Williamson wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 14:09 +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
>>>>>>> "/main-system-bus/pci.0,addr=09.0/virtio-blk-pci"
>>>> There's a device missing between the main system bus and the pci bus. Should
>>>> be something like:
>>>>
>>>> /main-system-bus/piix4-pcihost/pci.0/_09.0
>>> Ok, I can easily come up with:
>>>
>>> /System/main-system-bus/i440FX-pcihost/PCI/pci.0/_09.0/virtio-blk-pci/virtio-blk
>> First two elements are redundant, '/' already stands for the main system
>> bus.
>
> Ok, we can start printing after the system bus.
>
>> Then I don't get what last element expresses (the target device is
>> virtio-blk-pci). Is this due to some vmstate layout? But that should not
>> be part into qdev paths (maybe I'm missing your use case).
>
> Sorry, I wasn't clear about that. My printf is in the savevm code,
> after it's already appended the idstr passed in from the device. The
> device path in the example above ends at virtio-blk-pci. That's the
> dev->info->name of the device passed into this function.
>
>> And instead of introducing another hierarchy level with the bus address,
>> I would also prefer to add this as prefix or suffix to the device name,
>> e.g. <driver>.<busaddr>.
>
> That's what I had started with. The first post in this thread has
> "pci.0,addr=09.0" as a single hierarchy level. The "addr=" may be
> unnecessary there, but I also prefer something along those lines. For
> PCI it'd make sense to have <name>:<addr>, which comes out to
> "pci.0:09.0". (Maybe rather than flagging properties as being relevant
> to the path and printing them generically, we should extract specific
> properties based on the bus type.)
Not bus.addr, driver.addr. We only have one PCI bus here, not as many as
there are slots on that bus.
>
>>>> For busses that don't have a consistent addressing scheme then some sort of
>>>> instance ID is unavoidable. I guess it may be possible to invent something
>>>> based on other device properties (e.g. address of the first IO port/memory
>>>> region).
>>> Instance IDs aren't always bad, we just run into trouble with hotplug
>>> and maybe creating unique ramblock names. But, such busses typically
>>> don't support hotplug and don't have multiple instances of the same
>>> device on the bus, so I don't expect us to hit many issues there as long
>>> as we can get a stable address path. Thanks,
>>>
>> If stable instance numbers are required, we could simply keep them in
>> DeviceState and search for the smallest free one on additions. Actually,
>> I'm more in favor of this direction than including the bus address. That
>> way we could keep a canonical format across all buses and do not have to
>> provide possibly complex ID generation rules for each of them.
>
> I started down that path, but it still breaks for hotplug. If we start
> a VM with two e1000 NICs, then remove the first, we can no longer
> migrate because the target can't represent having a single e1000 with a
> non-zero instance ID.
That's indeed a good point.
Still, I'm worried about having to define numbering schemes for all the
buses qemu supports. Maybe we can run a mixture: address-based for
hotplug-capably buses (they tend to be cooperative in this regard) and
simple instance numbers for the rest, likely the majority.
>
>> BTW, the problem isn't truly solved by printing paths. We also need to
>> parse them. It would be counterproductive if such paths ever see the
>> light of day (ie. "leak" outside vmstate) and a user tries to hack it
>> into the monitor or pass it on the command line. With my series, I'm
>> currently able to process paths like this one:
>>
>> /i440FX-pcihost.0/pci.0/PIIX4_PM.0/i2c/smbus-eeprom.6
>
> Yes, these are only intended for internal use, but we should get them to
> sync up as much as possible. Thanks,
Unless there is a good reason, the match should be 100%.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-14 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-14 5:51 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/5] Introduce canonical device hierarchy string Alex Williamson
2010-06-14 5:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 1/5] qdev: Create qdev_get_dev_path() Alex Williamson
2010-06-14 6:39 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-06-14 12:52 ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-14 13:00 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-14 13:09 ` Paul Brook
2010-06-14 15:29 ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-14 15:42 ` Paul Brook
2010-06-14 16:00 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-14 16:38 ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-14 16:49 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2010-06-14 18:35 ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-14 21:43 ` Paul Brook
2010-06-14 22:11 ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-14 22:46 ` Paul Brook
2010-06-15 1:14 ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-15 11:24 ` Paul Brook
2010-06-15 8:47 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-06-15 9:34 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-15 11:28 ` Paul Brook
2010-06-15 11:45 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-15 12:04 ` Paul Brook
2010-06-15 12:16 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-15 12:39 ` Paul Brook
2010-06-15 13:00 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-15 13:14 ` Paul Brook
2010-06-15 13:16 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-06-15 13:32 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-15 20:53 ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-15 21:55 ` Paul Brook
2010-06-15 22:33 ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-15 23:01 ` Paul Brook
2010-06-15 23:10 ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-16 0:25 ` Chris Wright
2010-06-16 0:30 ` Paul Brook
2010-06-16 0:35 ` Chris Wright
2010-06-16 1:30 ` Paul Brook
2010-06-16 2:55 ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-16 8:23 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-06-17 22:25 ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-18 9:16 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-18 15:01 ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-18 15:22 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-18 14:03 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-06-18 14:14 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-18 15:21 ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-15 11:42 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-06-15 11:59 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-15 13:07 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-06-15 13:19 ` Paul Brook
2010-06-15 13:32 ` Paul Brook
2010-06-15 15:08 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-16 13:02 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-06-14 5:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 2/5] savevm: Add DeviceState param Alex Williamson
2010-06-14 5:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 3/5] savevm: Make use of the new " Alex Williamson
2010-06-14 5:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 4/5] eepro100: Add a dev field to eeprom new/free functions Alex Williamson
2010-06-14 5:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 5/5] virtio-net: Incorporate a DeviceState pointer and let savevm track instances Alex Williamson
2010-06-14 7:02 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Introduce canonical device hierarchy string Gerd Hoffmann
2010-06-14 19:56 ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-15 8:53 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-06-15 18:01 ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-16 8:34 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-06-16 8:36 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-06-15 9:12 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2010-06-15 18:03 ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-16 9:46 ` RFC qdev path semantics (was: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/5] Introduce canonical device hierarchy string) Markus Armbruster
2010-06-16 10:40 ` Paul Brook
2010-06-16 11:37 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: RFC qdev path semantics Jan Kiszka
2010-06-16 11:45 ` Paul Brook
2010-06-16 12:01 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-16 12:21 ` Paul Brook
2010-06-16 13:50 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-16 13:05 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-06-16 13:23 ` Paul Brook
2010-06-16 14:31 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-06-17 21:43 ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-17 22:01 ` Paul Brook
2010-06-17 22:34 ` Alex Williamson
2010-06-18 7:52 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2010-06-18 14:58 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-06-22 14:27 ` Anthony Liguori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C165DA5.70105@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=chrisw@redhat.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).