[Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for June 22

[Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for June 22

[Chris Wright]

Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.

If we have a lack of agenda items I'll cancel the week's call.

thanks,
-chris

[Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for June 22

[Juan Quintela]

Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com> wrote:
> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>
> If we have a lack of agenda items I'll cancel the week's call.

As we have no agenda.  This week call gets cancelled.

Thanks, Juan.

> thanks,
> -chris

[Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for June 22

[Anthony Liguori]

On 06/22/2010 07:04 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Chris Wright<chrisw@redhat.com>  wrote:
>    
>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>
>> If we have a lack of agenda items I'll cancel the week's call.
>>      
> As we have no agenda.  This week call gets cancelled.
>    

Could we send the agenda note out a little bit earlier?

The note arrived at 12:55am CST and we decided we had no agenda at 
7:04am CST.   That's a pretty short window and I imagine a lot of people 
in the US are not actually awake during that period of time :-)

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Thanks, Juan.
>
>    
>> thanks,
>> -chris
>>      
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>    

[Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for June 22

[Alex Williamson]

On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 07:49 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/22/2010 07:04 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> > Chris Wright<chrisw@redhat.com>  wrote:
> >    
> >> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
> >>
> >> If we have a lack of agenda items I'll cancel the week's call.
> >>      
> > As we have no agenda.  This week call gets cancelled.
> >    
> 
> Could we send the agenda note out a little bit earlier?
> 
> The note arrived at 12:55am CST and we decided we had no agenda at 
> 7:04am CST.   That's a pretty short window and I imagine a lot of people 
> in the US are not actually awake during that period of time :-)

Indeed, open at midnight, closed at 6am here.  If anyone is still
interested, I'd like to talk about canonical device paths
(vmstate/ramblock naming).

Alex

[Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for June 22

[Alexander Graf]

Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 07:49 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>   
>> On 06/22/2010 07:04 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>     
>>> Chris Wright<chrisw@redhat.com>  wrote:
>>>    
>>>       
>>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>>>
>>>> If we have a lack of agenda items I'll cancel the week's call.
>>>>      
>>>>         
>>> As we have no agenda.  This week call gets cancelled.
>>>    
>>>       
>> Could we send the agenda note out a little bit earlier?
>>
>> The note arrived at 12:55am CST and we decided we had no agenda at 
>> 7:04am CST.   That's a pretty short window and I imagine a lot of people 
>> in the US are not actually awake during that period of time :-)
>>     
>
> Indeed, open at midnight, closed at 6am here.  If anyone is still
> interested, I'd like to talk about canonical device paths
> (vmstate/ramblock naming).
>   

In fact, the only times the call was canceled right after it started was
when Anthony was on vacation. I think the canceling rule doesn't make
sense when he's around.


Alex

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for June 22

[Jes Sorensen]

On 06/22/10 15:23, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Alex Williamson wrote:      
>>> Could we send the agenda note out a little bit earlier?
>>>
>>> The note arrived at 12:55am CST and we decided we had no agenda at 
>>> 7:04am CST.   That's a pretty short window and I imagine a lot of people 
>>> in the US are not actually awake during that period of time :-)
>>>     
>>
>> Indeed, open at midnight, closed at 6am here.  If anyone is still
>> interested, I'd like to talk about canonical device paths
>> (vmstate/ramblock naming).
>>   
> 
> In fact, the only times the call was canceled right after it started was
> when Anthony was on vacation. I think the canceling rule doesn't make
> sense when he's around.

It sounds like we should have the call and modify Chris' crontab to send
out the note 18 hours earlier :)

Cheers,
Jes

[Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for June 22

[Juan Quintela]

Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> wrote:
> Alex Williamson wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 07:49 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>   
>>> On 06/22/2010 07:04 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>>     
>>>> Chris Wright<chrisw@redhat.com>  wrote:
>>>>    
>>>>       
>>>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>>>>
>>>>> If we have a lack of agenda items I'll cancel the week's call.
>>>>>      
>>>>>         
>>>> As we have no agenda.  This week call gets cancelled.
>>>>    
>>>>       
>>> Could we send the agenda note out a little bit earlier?
>>>
>>> The note arrived at 12:55am CST and we decided we had no agenda at 
>>> 7:04am CST.   That's a pretty short window and I imagine a lot of people 
>>> in the US are not actually awake during that period of time :-)
>>>     
>>
>> Indeed, open at midnight, closed at 6am here.  If anyone is still
>> interested, I'd like to talk about canonical device paths
>> (vmstate/ramblock naming).
>>   
>
> In fact, the only times the call was canceled right after it started was
> when Anthony was on vacation. I think the canceling rule doesn't make
> sense when he's around.

Oops. I was asked to run meeting or cancel it if nobody sent anything to
the agenda.  I didn't look at the time that the agenda was sent, sorry.

And I think we canceled the meeting 2-3 weeks ago, no?

Later, Juan.

[Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for June 22

[Anthony Liguori]

On 06/22/2010 09:10 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Alexander Graf<agraf@suse.de>  wrote:
>    
>> Alex Williamson wrote:
>>      
>>> On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 07:49 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>
>>>        
>>>> On 06/22/2010 07:04 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>>> Chris Wright<chrisw@redhat.com>   wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>            
>>>>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If we have a lack of agenda items I'll cancel the week's call.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>              
>>>>> As we have no agenda.  This week call gets cancelled.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>            
>>>> Could we send the agenda note out a little bit earlier?
>>>>
>>>> The note arrived at 12:55am CST and we decided we had no agenda at
>>>> 7:04am CST.   That's a pretty short window and I imagine a lot of people
>>>> in the US are not actually awake during that period of time :-)
>>>>
>>>>          
>>> Indeed, open at midnight, closed at 6am here.  If anyone is still
>>> interested, I'd like to talk about canonical device paths
>>> (vmstate/ramblock naming).
>>>
>>>        
>> In fact, the only times the call was canceled right after it started was
>> when Anthony was on vacation. I think the canceling rule doesn't make
>> sense when he's around.
>>      
> Oops. I was asked to run meeting or cancel it if nobody sent anything to
> the agenda.  I didn't look at the time that the agenda was sent, sorry.
>
> And I think we canceled the meeting 2-3 weeks ago, no?
>    

I think for the past month or so, whether the meeting gets cancelled is 
based on a race condition between me finishing my first cup of coffee 
and you sending out the cancellation note ;-)

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Later, Juan.
>    

[Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for June 22

[Juan Quintela]

Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
> On 06/22/2010 09:10 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:

> I think for the past month or so, whether the meeting gets cancelled
> is based on a race condition between me finishing my first cup of
> coffee and you sending out the cancellation note ;-)

This is my 1st cancellation note, so ...

But from there on, I will talk with Chris about sending it on his Sunday
night or my Monday morning (i.e. 24h before the decission to cancel (or
not)) the call.

Sorry for the inconvenience, Juan.

> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori
>
>> Later, Juan.
>>