qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v2] lsi53c895a: fix Phase Mismatch Jump
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 10:02:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C246289.1060908@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1276535514-19724-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>

On 06/14/2010 07:11 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> lsi_bad_phase has a bug in the choice of pmjad1/pmjad2.  This does
> not matter with Linux guests because it uses just one routine for
> both, but it breaks Windows 64-bit guests.  This is the text
> from the spec:
>
>     "[The PMJCTL] bit controls which decision mechanism is used
>     when jumping on phase mismatch. When this bit is cleared the
>     LSI53C895A will use Phase Mismatch Jump Address 1 (PMJAD1) when
>     the WSR bit is cleared and Phase Mismatch Jump Address 2 (PMJAD2)
>     when the WSR bit is set.  When this bit is set the LSI53C895A will
>     use jump address one (PMJAD1) on data out (data out, command,
>     message out) transfers and jump address two (PMJAD2) on data in
>     (data in, status, message in) transfers."
>
> Which means:
>
>      CCNTL0.PMJCTL
>          0              SCNTL2.WSR = 0             PMJAD1
>          0              SCNTL2.WSR = 1             PMJAD2
>          1                    out                  PMJAD1
>          1                    in                   PMJAD2
>
> In qemu, what you get instead is:
>
>      CCNTL0.PMJCTL
>          0                    out                  PMJAD1
>          0                    in                   PMJAD2<<<<<
>          1                    out                  PMJAD1
>          1                    in                   PMJAD1<<<<<
>
> Considering that qemu always has SCNTL2.WSR cleared, the two marked cases
> (corresponding to phase mismatch on input) are always jumping to the
> wrong PMJAD register.  The patch implements the correct semantics.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini<pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
>          >  Looks correct. But why not assigning s->pmjad[12] directly? Would
>          >  improve readability IMO.
>
>          No particular reason, hence fine by me.
>
>   hw/lsi53c895a.c |    6 +++---
>   1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/lsi53c895a.c b/hw/lsi53c895a.c
> index f5a91ba..9a37fed 100644
> --- a/hw/lsi53c895a.c
> +++ b/hw/lsi53c895a.c
> @@ -490,10 +490,10 @@ static void lsi_bad_phase(LSIState *s, int out, int new_phase)
>   {
>       /* Trigger a phase mismatch.  */
>       if (s->ccntl0&  LSI_CCNTL0_ENPMJ) {
> -        if ((s->ccntl0&  LSI_CCNTL0_PMJCTL) || out) {
> -            s->dsp = s->pmjad1;
> +        if ((s->ccntl0&  LSI_CCNTL0_PMJCTL)) {
> +            s->dsp = out ? s->pmjad1 : s->pmjad2;
>           } else {
> -            s->dsp = s->pmjad2;
> +            s->dsp = (s->scntl2&  LSI_SCNTL2_WSR ? s->pmjad2 : s->pmjad1);
>           }
>           DPRINTF("Data phase mismatch jump to %08x\n", s->dsp);
>       } else {

PING

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-25 17:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-14 16:41 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] lsi53c895a: fix Phase Mismatch Jump Paolo Bonzini
2010-06-14 17:05 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2010-06-14 17:10   ` Michal Novotny
2010-06-14 17:11   ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] " Paolo Bonzini
2010-06-25  8:02     ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2010-06-29 21:11     ` Aurelien Jarno
2010-06-14 17:14   ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] " Michal Novotny
2010-06-14 17:31     ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-14 17:34       ` Michal Novotny

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C246289.1060908@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).