From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36126 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OTB70-00062r-J9
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:58:47 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1OTB6z-0005KH-AO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:58:46 -0400
Received: from mail-vw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.212.45]:47605)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1OTB6z-0005KD-6Z
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:58:45 -0400
Received: by vws14 with SMTP id 14so542788vws.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 02:58:44 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4C287249.50600@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:58:33 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1277484812-22012-1-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com>	<1277484812-22012-5-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com>	<20100625194201.GD2865@lst.de>
	<m38w622wbq.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>	<20100626094650.GA26793@lst.de>
	<m3d3vdsvgb.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
In-Reply-To: <m3d3vdsvgb.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 04/12] blockdev: New drive_of_blockdev()
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, kraxel@redhat.com

On 06/26/2010 04:46 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> drive_get_by_blockdev()?  blockdev_to_drive()?

I like drive_find_by_blockdev or drive_get_by_blockdev, in any case I'll 
make sure my own cpu_get_by_id is named in the same style that you choose.

Paolo