From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46676 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OUGMq-0002d4-2n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 05:47:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUGMn-0001T7-HR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 05:47:34 -0400 Received: from mail-qy0-f173.google.com ([209.85.216.173]:57074) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUGMn-0001Sx-Dg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 05:47:33 -0400 Received: by qyk34 with SMTP id 34so560311qyk.4 for ; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 02:47:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C2C642B.7050603@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 11:47:23 +0200 From: Jes Sorensen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [Bug 494500] Re: QEMU 0.12.0 does not support KVM with Kernel < 2.6.29, bug in ./configure and kvm-all.c References: <20091209132347.795.21673.malonedeb@gangotri.canonical.com> <20100630130541.18635.51520.malone@wampee.canonical.com> <4C2C3DFD.5010408@web.de> In-Reply-To: <4C2C3DFD.5010408@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Bug 494500 <494500@bugs.launchpad.net>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 07/01/10 09:04, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> As I wrote in this bug I had problems with a kernel 2.6.28-11 and the >> _latest_ version of kvm-kmod. It works only with the right (not the >> latest) version of kvm-kmod. > > Once you properly installed the kernel headers that kvm-kmod delivers, > qemu should detect their presence during configure and succeed with this > step. Of course, you also have to install the kvm-kmod modules which > will disable those that come with 2.6.28 to actually run qemu in kvm > mode later on. Hi Jan, Actually I would like to apologize, I hadn't realized the situation around mr Warnke's bug. Had I looked at this and the other bugs he constantly reopens when it's clear they are not real bugs, I wouldn't have posted to it in the first place. I suggest we leave them and don't add anymore to these bugs to avoid unescessary noise on the list. Cheers, Jes