From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36014 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OUOiI-00052l-Co
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 14:42:24 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1OUOiB-0007IR-NY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 14:42:18 -0400
Received: from mail-qw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.216.45]:42552)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1OUOiB-0007IB-LJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 14:42:11 -0400
Received: by qwg8 with SMTP id 8so890255qwg.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 11:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C2CE1A1.8090300@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 13:42:41 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [Bug 599958] Re: Timedrift problems with Win7:
	hpet missing time drift fixups
References: <20100629211802.16137.10587.malonedeb@soybean.canonical.com>	<20100630143856.18577.70291.malone@wampee.canonical.com>
	<4C2C402C.9040502@web.de>
In-Reply-To: <4C2C402C.9040502@web.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 07/01/2010 02:13 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>    
>> -no-hpet works in every version of qemu/qemu-kvm that has included HPET
>> support.  RHEL disables HPET support by default unlike qemu and qemu-
>> kvm.
>>
>> I've updated the bug priority and title to reflect what the issue is.
>>
>> We only support edge triggered interrupts with HPET which seems to be
>> what most OSes use anyway.
>>      
> qemu.git now also supports level triggering.
>    

Indeed it does :-)

>    
>>   We could potentially use the
>> reset_irq_delivered/get_irq_delivered APIC functions to implement
>> interrupt catch-up but I think it would be better to try to merge Jan's
>> generic IRQ delivered API first.
>>      
> Which one? I'm a bit tired of rebasing versions that will only be
> rejected again. :)
>    

Yeah, I appreciate your frustration here.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori