From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53766 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OUxZQ-0001Yx-Tn
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 03:55:30 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <jan.kiszka@web.de>) id 1OUxZP-0000ZR-KP
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 03:55:28 -0400
Received: from fmmailgate02.web.de ([217.72.192.227]:53387)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <jan.kiszka@web.de>) id 1OUxZP-0000Z5-7z
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 03:55:27 -0400
Message-ID: <4C2EECE8.8030305@web.de>
Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2010 09:55:20 +0200
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [Bug 599958] Re: Timedrift problems with Win7:
	hpet missing time drift fixups
References: <20100629211802.16137.10587.malonedeb@soybean.canonical.com>
	<201007011645.18184.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<4C2CE393.3040203@codemonkey.ws>
	<201007012240.51967.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<4C2EE93B.8030003@web.de>
	<AANLkTikwwlHm--1-yCquTZwdonYn0soYguEIQoOw0N1R@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikwwlHm--1-yCquTZwdonYn0soYguEIQoOw0N1R@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="------------enig1530D0A0016E6B3721CB914C"
Sender: jan.kiszka@web.de
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig1530D0A0016E6B3721CB914C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de> wrote:
>> Paul Brook wrote:
>>>> I really see no tangible objection to Jan's patches.  They don't imp=
act
>>>> any other code.  They don't inhibit flexibility in the infrastructur=
e.
>>>> You might consider it to be a "hack" but so what.  QEMU is filled wi=
th
>>>> hacks.  It would be useless without them because there would be very=

>>>> little code.
>>> I object strongly to anything that makes qemu_irq a message passing A=
PI.
>>> if you want message passing then you should not be using qemu_irq.
>> Blueswirl objected to the straightforward return-value approach I firs=
t
>> posted. You seems to be more open towards this, right? Still looks lik=
e
>> I cannot make you both happy at the same time. So what to do?
>=20
> I have withdrawn my objection. We can do message passing with some
> different API later, for simple coalescing needs the return value
> approach is enough.

Great! I'll respin my patches ASAP.

Jan


--------------enig1530D0A0016E6B3721CB914C
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkwu7OwACgkQitSsb3rl5xQJBwCgxl9ZO5NckeoMx3Nfxt+53y/t
lcIAn0CtA1p+PMAqbQ0O1E+TpB3M46d7
=yZ/T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig1530D0A0016E6B3721CB914C--