From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43788 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OW8aX-0005k0-Lc
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:53:31 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1OW8aW-00042G-1H
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:53:29 -0400
Received: from mail-gw0-f45.google.com ([74.125.83.45]:59867)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1OW8aV-00041y-V6
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:53:28 -0400
Received: by gwj20 with SMTP id 20so3221392gwj.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 06:53:27 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C33354E.7080803@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 08:53:18 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM Call agenda for July 6th
References: <m3630uxfks.fsf@trasno.mitica> <20100705110542.5d98c2ee@redhat.com>
	<4C332EFB.3040606@codemonkey.ws> <4C3331A2.2030400@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C3331A2.2030400@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>

On 07/06/2010 08:37 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 06.07.2010 15:26, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>    
>> On 07/05/2010 09:05 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>>      
>>> On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 14:45:23 +0200
>>> Juan Quintela<quintela@redhat.com>   wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>>>
>>>>          
>>> - 0.13 release
>>>
>>>        
>> I was hoping to do -rc0 before the holiday but that didn't happen so I'm
>> working on it now.  Figure release is ~1 week from -rc0.
>>      
> What does this mean for patches that should go into 0.13 and aren't
> strictly bug fixes? When should the pull request be sent latest?
>    

Last week?

I'd really like to put out -rc0 today and I'm trying to free up time to 
get through the backlog of patches to make that happen.  I just pushed 
your latest pull.  If you've got another pull request ready send it 
now.  But I can't promise that I'll take anything that hasn't already 
shown up.

We really need to get the 0.13 release out and have to draw the line 
somewhere.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Kevin
>