From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57774 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OW8lZ-0001cy-7f
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 10:04:54 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1OW8lX-0006DX-Qc
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 10:04:53 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:14937)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1OW8lX-0006DA-IV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 10:04:51 -0400
Message-ID: <4C3337FB.5060808@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 16:04:43 +0200
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM Call agenda for July 6th
References: <m3630uxfks.fsf@trasno.mitica> <20100705110542.5d98c2ee@redhat.com>
	<4C332EFB.3040606@codemonkey.ws> <4C3331A2.2030400@redhat.com>
	<4C33354E.7080803@codemonkey.ws>
In-Reply-To: <4C33354E.7080803@codemonkey.ws>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>

Am 06.07.2010 15:53, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 07/06/2010 08:37 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 06.07.2010 15:26, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>>    
>>> On 07/05/2010 09:05 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>>>      
>>>> On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 14:45:23 +0200
>>>> Juan Quintela<quintela@redhat.com>   wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>> - 0.13 release
>>>>
>>>>        
>>> I was hoping to do -rc0 before the holiday but that didn't happen so I'm
>>> working on it now.  Figure release is ~1 week from -rc0.
>>>      
>> What does this mean for patches that should go into 0.13 and aren't
>> strictly bug fixes? When should the pull request be sent latest?
>>    
> 
> Last week?

Sure, but it didn't happen then and things have moved forward.

> I'd really like to put out -rc0 today and I'm trying to free up time to 
> get through the backlog of patches to make that happen.  I just pushed 
> your latest pull.  If you've got another pull request ready send it 
> now.  But I can't promise that I'll take anything that hasn't already 
> shown up.

I'm just reviewing and merging v2 of Markus' block fixes/cleanups and
I'm considering the Sheepdog block driver (which seems to have had
enough iterations and doesn't touch a single line of code outside its
own file).

Kevin