From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47413 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OWA4C-0003uR-BY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 11:28:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OWA4B-0007ZE-9R for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 11:28:12 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:54804) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OWA4B-0007Z4-2h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 11:28:11 -0400 Message-ID: <4C334B7F.7070108@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:27:59 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM Call agenda for July 6th References: <20100705110542.5d98c2ee@redhat.com> <4C332EFB.3040606@codemonkey.ws> <4C3331A2.2030400@redhat.com> <4C33354E.7080803@codemonkey.ws> <4C3337FB.5060808@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: Chris Wright , kvm-devel , Juan Quintela , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Luiz Capitulino Am 06.07.2010 17:19, schrieb Markus Armbruster: > Kevin Wolf writes: > >> Am 06.07.2010 15:53, schrieb Anthony Liguori: >>> On 07/06/2010 08:37 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: >>>> Am 06.07.2010 15:26, schrieb Anthony Liguori: >>>> >>>>> On 07/05/2010 09:05 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 14:45:23 +0200 >>>>>> Juan Quintela wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> - 0.13 release >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> I was hoping to do -rc0 before the holiday but that didn't happen so I'm >>>>> working on it now. Figure release is ~1 week from -rc0. >>>>> >>>> What does this mean for patches that should go into 0.13 and aren't >>>> strictly bug fixes? When should the pull request be sent latest? >>>> >>> >>> Last week? >> >> Sure, but it didn't happen then and things have moved forward. >> >>> I'd really like to put out -rc0 today and I'm trying to free up time to >>> get through the backlog of patches to make that happen. I just pushed >>> your latest pull. If you've got another pull request ready send it >>> now. But I can't promise that I'll take anything that hasn't already >>> shown up. >> >> I'm just reviewing and merging v2 of Markus' block fixes/cleanups and >> I'm considering the Sheepdog block driver (which seems to have had >> enough iterations and doesn't touch a single line of code outside its >> own file). > > Any chance to get the next series (Split ide-drive and scsi-disk qdevs, > and more) as well? 1-3/8 are bug fixes, and 4/8 removes unreliable > information from info block; wanted in .13. 5-8/8 could be punted to > .14. If it's purely bug fixes, I think we can still take it after -rc0. Kevin