From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53088 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OYinb-0000e8-B3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:57:44 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1OYinW-0003w6-5N
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:57:39 -0400
Received: from mail-qw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.216.45]:45719)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1OYinW-0003w1-08
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:57:34 -0400
Received: by qwf6 with SMTP id 6so980744qwf.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 09:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C3C9AF9.30405@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:57:29 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th
References: <m3eif8iw82.fsf@trasno.mitica> <4C3BED6C.20601@redhat.com>
	<4C3C0E5C.50902@aurel32.net> <4C3C1878.2060003@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C3C1878.2060003@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>

On 07/13/2010 02:40 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/13/2010 09:57 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> Avi Kivity a écrit :
>>> On 07/12/2010 05:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> 0.12.n+1
>>>
>> I won't be at the KVM call, but I can work on that in the next days.
>>
>> Basically the stable tree already contains a lot of fixes and we can do
>> a call for patches for this release. One week should be enough, so that
>> we can have the release at the end of next week (a few technical days
>> are needed in addition).
>
> Thanks.
>
> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable 
> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or 
> data integrity fixes).

Would you like to see more frequent stable releases or more frequent 
master releases?

The later is a bit easier since it doesn't involve maintaining and 
testing two code bases.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori