From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35247 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OYjbI-0002Mt-Qb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 13:49:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OYjbE-0003XA-G6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 13:49:00 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:3284) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OYjbE-0003X0-9x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 13:48:56 -0400 Message-ID: <4C3CA6F7.10405@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:48:39 +0300 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th References: <4C3C9AF9.30405@codemonkey.ws> <4C3C9BE2.5010200@redhat.com> <201007131219.21649.iggy@theiggy.com> In-Reply-To: <201007131219.21649.iggy@theiggy.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Brian Jackson Cc: Aurelien Jarno , Juan Quintela , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-devel On 07/13/2010 08:19 PM, Brian Jackson wrote: > >> Yes. But in this context I'm interested in stable releases. We have >> bugs reported, fixed, and the fix applied, yet the fixes are unreachable >> to users. >> > Especially so since qemu-kvm 0.12-stable hasn't been merged with qemu > basically since 0.12.4 came out. I was trying to help one of the Gentoo > maintainers find post 0.12.4 patches the other day and had to point them to > the upstream qemu stable tree. > An email should suffice to get things merged. -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.