From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for July 27
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:00:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C4ED85B.2090807@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3wrshqtnc.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
On 07/27/2010 02:19 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Anthony Liguori<anthony@codemonkey.ws> writes:
>
>
>> - any additional input on probed_raw?
>>
> Isn't it a fait accompli? I stopped providing input when commit
> 79368c81 appeared.
>
No. 79368c81 was to close the security hole (and I do consider it a
security hole). But as I mentioned on the list, I'm also not satisfied
with it and that's why I proposed probed_raw. I was hoping to get a
little more input from those that objected to 79368c81 as to whether
probed_raw was more agreeable.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-27 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-26 21:28 [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for July 27 Chris Wright
2010-07-26 22:28 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2010-07-26 23:28 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-07-27 0:13 ` Alex Williamson
2010-07-27 13:22 ` Jes Sorensen
2010-07-27 7:19 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-07-27 13:00 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2010-07-27 13:28 ` Kevin Wolf
2010-07-27 15:22 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-07-27 15:28 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-07-27 15:37 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2010-07-27 16:17 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-27 16:24 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2010-07-27 16:29 ` Chris Wright
2010-07-27 16:32 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-27 16:36 ` Chris Wright
2010-07-27 16:42 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-27 17:01 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2010-07-27 17:37 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-27 16:42 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2010-07-27 16:47 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-27 16:48 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-28 11:22 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-07-28 11:25 ` Kevin Wolf
2010-07-28 13:08 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-07-27 11:51 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2010-07-27 13:30 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-07-27 13:43 ` Cole Robinson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C4ED85B.2090807@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=chrisw@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).