From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40548 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OfxVb-0002RJ-Po
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 12:05:01 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1OfxVN-0000Gm-Ho
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 12:04:46 -0400
Received: from mail-qy0-f180.google.com ([209.85.216.180]:61225)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1OfxVN-0000Gg-Eb
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 12:04:45 -0400
Received: by qyk31 with SMTP id 31so92622qyk.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 09:04:45 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C56EC9A.8020304@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 11:04:42 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Drop braces around single statement rule
References: <1280593414-2232-1-git-send-email-av1474@comtv.ru>
	<AANLkTi=Bs0eegcR2C3=dNd=VZ7Zz-a2N+hj-uBAXN+09@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100731234956.GJ31640@hall.aurel32.net>
	<4C56E253.7010403@codemonkey.ws> <4C56E732.7060102@redhat.com>
	<alpine.LNX.2.00.1008021953240.1412@linmac>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1008021953240.1412@linmac>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: malc <av1474@comtv.ru>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>

On 08/02/2010 10:55 AM, malc wrote:
>>> Rejecting a big patch because braces aren't used in single line if
>>> statements seems to be an unnecessary barrier to me.
>>>        
>> Taking such patches anyway is basically what we're doing today, right?
>> And what malc is complaining about.
>>      
> Malc is mainly complaining about "Quod licet Jovi non licet bovi"
> situation.
>    

Very fair point.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori