From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44571 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OgWw6-0004II-J6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 01:54:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OgWw5-0000mA-EA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 01:54:42 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46979) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OgWw5-0000m5-6L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 01:54:41 -0400 Message-ID: <4C59009B.1050500@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:54:35 +0300 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Anyone seeing huge slowdown launching qemu with Linux 2.6.35? References: <4C5848C7.3090806@redhat.com> <4C584982.5000108@codemonkey.ws> <4C584B66.5070404@redhat.com> <4C5854F1.3000905@codemonkey.ws> <4C5858B2.9090801@redhat.com> <4C585F5B.5070502@codemonkey.ws> <4C58635B.7020407@redhat.com> <20100803190525.GB16570@redhat.com> <4C586AB9.5040302@codemonkey.ws> <4C586CF9.7030206@redhat.com> <20100803220628.GC28523@amd.home.annexia.org> In-Reply-To: <20100803220628.GC28523@amd.home.annexia.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Richard W.M. Jones" Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Gleb Natapov , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 08/04/2010 01:06 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 10:24:41PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: >> Why do we need to transfer roms? These are devices on the memory >> bus or pci bus, it just needs to be there at the right address. >> Boot splash should just be another rom as it would be on a real >> system. > Just like the initrd? There isn't enough address space for a 100MB initrd in ROM. -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.