From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57700 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OjWXS-0001Up-2P
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 08:05:42 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1OjWXO-00035n-JQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 08:05:37 -0400
Received: from mail-vw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.212.45]:53911)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1OjWXO-00035d-Gn
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 08:05:34 -0400
Received: by vws19 with SMTP id 19so601237vws.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 05:05:33 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4C63E38A.10303@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 08:05:30 -0400
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4C62825A.6000903@mail.berlios.de>	<AANLkTinXC8r+13q5y9K+mvyNZPNbvycRq8p4FU5T+J1K@mail.gmail.com>	<4C62E980.9090707@mail.berlios.de>	<AANLkTik1ME4iyBR1voUdTWx-oVbE_kFwTx+wYUyn3=1w@mail.gmail.com>	<AANLkTi=Gat28pePtFE08M9_R+cc=ygHuiT3VB0dxsj7S@mail.gmail.com>	<4C62FBFE.8050801@mail.berlios.de>
	<4C63204D.4080009@redhat.com> <4C63BC16.8040708@mail.berlios.de>
In-Reply-To: <4C63BC16.8040708@mail.berlios.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Unmaintained QEMU builds
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Stefan Weil <weil@mail.berlios.de>
Cc: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On 08/12/2010 05:17 AM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Jes has an opinion how thinks should be done, and I have a different one.
> If you read the complete history, you can see that I suggested a
> compromise (*)
> which would give the same result as Jes' suggestions. Only the steps
> to reach this result were different, and I have good reasons why I
> prefer my way to do them. Both ways require two commits, so
> there would be no difference for the community nor for the
> committers.

I may even agree with you, but if nobody takes the effort to continue a 
discussion you have to proceed as if everyone agreed with Jes.  In 
particular, the patch would have been so easy to redo along those lines, 
that IMHO it wasn't worthwhile arguing.

Paolo