From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34628 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ol1I8-0005D0-Ol for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:08:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ol1I3-0002uc-HN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:08:00 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.213.45]:60239) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ol1I3-0002uT-DL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:07:55 -0400 Received: by ywt2 with SMTP id 2so2076952ywt.4 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:07:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C695447.6030603@codemonkey.ws> Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:07:51 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/15] xen: Add xen_machine_fv References: <1281622202-3453-2-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> <4C694054.8010600@redhat.com> <4C6947A6.70908@redhat.com> <4C694D64.8040402@codemonkey.ws> <4C695070.5010405@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4C695070.5010405@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: Anthony Perard , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , Stefano Stabellini On 08/16/2010 09:51 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 16.08.2010 16:38, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > >> >> To be honest, I think we'll need KVM, Xen, and QEMU specific machines. >> >> The right default set of hardware for all three is different. >> > Right, I agree. This is why I put the exception for the platform device. > There are probably some more devices for which the same applies. > > But these exceptions all about guest state. If qdev was finished, this > would be a matter of having a different configuration file, right? > > This series, as I understand it, is adding much more to the Xen FV > machine. Things that are not about which devices a VM contains, but > about some implementation details of the host. > Yeah, but dropping the target-xen will probably fix most of that stuff. Regards, Anthony Liguori > Kevin >