From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44894 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Om4iT-0006IW-Ti
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 08:59:35 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1Om4iS-0005uM-9K
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 08:59:33 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58666)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1Om4iS-0005u7-2e
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 08:59:32 -0400
Message-ID: <4C6D2AAB.2050101@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:59:23 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] CODING_STYLE: add C type rules
References: <AANLkTinM4GFK8cUj3gAyUNFT_9yM83MGTbDiwLjvCJi2@mail.gmail.com>
	<4C6A43B5.40809@redhat.com> <4C6AD744.1070009@twiddle.net>
	<4C6ADFED.5020703@redhat.com> <4C6C0E4D.6040607@redhat.com>
	<4C6CE416.1050902@redhat.com> <4C6CE6F4.20804@redhat.com>
	<4C6CE88C.9050100@redhat.com> <4C6D2294.60304@redhat.com>
	<alpine.LNX.2.00.1008191645010.4502@linmac>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1008191645010.4502@linmac>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: malc <av1474@comtv.ru>
Cc: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>, Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>

  On 08/19/2010 03:52 PM, malc wrote:
>
>> Not at all, _Bool is smaller or equal to int and thus can only improve
>> packing.
> That's not what standard says:
>
> 6.2.5#2
>
> An object declared as type _Bool is large enough to store the values 0 and
>
> It later goes on to say (6.7.2.1 fn120):
>
> While the number of bits in a _Bool object is at least CHAR_BIT, the width
> (number of sign and value bits) of a _Bool may be just 1 bit.
>

That's not in conflict (well, the standard allows sizeof(_Bool) > 
sizeof(int), but that's unlikely).


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function