From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50256 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Om5EJ-0007dF-HR
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:32:28 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>) id 1Om5EE-0003KN-Li
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:32:27 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:7648)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>) id 1Om5EE-0003K5-FJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:32:22 -0400
Message-ID: <4C6D3260.8010103@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:32:16 +0200
From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] CODING_STYLE amendments
References: <AANLkTikc=-mLwgK4WkhMEuhxbzVuiMn354=agB11H4W1@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.LNX.2.00.1008122251300.1975@linmac>
	<AANLkTin34MbLNV7N+cQVtft2q6BkgAD2nA6oBASk9oah@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimM5aaYyfTkOpN-EpTqKM6uKLMv7E9ioGxdYudS@mail.gmail.com>
	<4C6A4291.1020105@redhat.com> <4C6A8CD8.2080701@codemonkey.ws>
	<4C6A94D0.2090201@redhat.com>
	<AANLkTineoPuui02ONpk7ZNDKyVAfBJmrtmgVCxWTCz_3@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTineoPuui02ONpk7ZNDKyVAfBJmrtmgVCxWTCz_3@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Cc: Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho <miguel.filho@gmail.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On 08/17/10 20:56, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com> wrote:
>> I think we are in full agreement here, I am really just worried that we
>> add additional procedures here that will slow down the real development.
> 
> Either the braces rule in CODING_STYLE is downgraded to
> recommendation, or some kind of new order is introduced. Current
> situation is unfair.

Just to be sure I follow, are you suggesting we relax all of the bracing
rule, or just the part about braces around single line statements? I'd
be happy to write up a patch for the latter.

Cheers,
Jes