From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58069 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OmAOj-0008EZ-DV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:03:34 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1OmAOi-0000F4-6Q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:03:33 -0400
Received: from mail-gx0-f173.google.com ([209.85.161.173]:56249)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1OmAOh-0000Ez-W3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:03:32 -0400
Received: by gxk5 with SMTP id 5so953658gxk.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:03:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C6D7FFF.5040000@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:03:27 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/9] spice: simple display
References: <1282221625-29501-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com>
	<1282221625-29501-9-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com>
	<4C6D4221.8080504@codemonkey.ws>
	<alpine.LNX.2.00.1008191922390.5362@linmac>
	<4C6D4EF4.8020602@codemonkey.ws>
	<alpine.LNX.2.00.1008191935160.5661@linmac>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1008191935160.5661@linmac>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: malc <av1474@comtv.ru>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 08/19/2010 10:36 AM, malc wrote:
>> Apparently a recent POSIX function...
>>
>> Preferred alternatives?  I really dislike all caps macros.
>>      
> Macros should be all capps.
>    

If you like angry code.

But honestly, just make printd() a static inline and then every one's 
happy :-)

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> [..snip..]
>
>