From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51204 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OnGlz-000887-Pz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 16:04:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OnGly-00074T-I3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 16:04:07 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:8268) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OnGly-00074J-Bu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 16:04:06 -0400 Message-ID: <4C7182AA.6010707@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 23:03:54 +0300 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] CODING_STYLE amendments References: <4C6A4291.1020105@redhat.com> <4C6A8CD8.2080701@codemonkey.ws> <4C71550F.6080602@redhat.com> <4C716FB3.2090505@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <4C716FB3.2090505@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Jes Sorensen , Markus Armbruster , qemu-devel , Blue Swirl , Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho On 08/22/2010 09:42 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > I'm strongly opposed to any reformatting of the tree. I strongly second this statement. > > All it does is break git blame which makes debugging harder without > offering any real benefits. > Even worse, it makes backporting patches much harder. Sometimes we have to refactor the code to introduce new features or fix deep deficiencies. Let's not do it just to change the code style. -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.