From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Cc: Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho <miguel.filho@gmail.com>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] CODING_STYLE amendments
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:09:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C722CC4.9080606@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=_1pe53y=ZWYo-PVVzFcaYqm-2U2tpY8gg-YTD@mail.gmail.com>
On 08/22/10 20:13, Blue Swirl wrote:
> Well, consider for example mass braces conversion to the One Style,
> whichever that is. Would it be better to do it in one commit or
> multiple commits? If the latter, push all commits back-to-back or just
> one at a time now and then?
>
> At the extreme end, we could even convert one statement per commit.
> This would make bug hunting with git bisect extremely precise. There
> would be a cost of long commit log.
>
> For the patch submitters, wouldn't one shot conversion (with one push,
> one or many commits) be less painful?
Hi,
Yes, if we do it, I'd say one commit per file/file-set, like hw/irq.[ch]
etc.
>> and has elements making it harder to debug the code, like
>> the braces around single line if statements.
>
> What's the problem?
It chews up lines for no reason giving you less of an overview of the
code. Obviously there are cases where it makes sense, but having it
around a return statement is just a waste.
>> I totally agree with Markus
>> that it seems like wasted effort to come up with new tools and having to
>> maintain them when there are good ones out there like the ones from the
>> Linux kernel.
>
> I also find the tool argument very attractive. No other style has that benefit.
Yes, it's a big win.
Cheers,
Jes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-23 8:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-12 17:49 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] CODING_STYLE amendments Blue Swirl
2010-08-12 18:56 ` malc
2010-08-13 15:22 ` Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho
2010-08-13 18:02 ` Blue Swirl
2010-08-17 8:04 ` Jes Sorensen
2010-08-17 13:21 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-08-17 13:55 ` Jes Sorensen
2010-08-17 18:56 ` Blue Swirl
2010-08-19 13:32 ` Jes Sorensen
2010-08-19 18:29 ` Blue Swirl
2010-08-22 20:15 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-22 20:20 ` Jes Sorensen
2010-08-22 20:36 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-20 13:47 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-08-20 18:44 ` Blue Swirl
2010-08-20 20:24 ` Blue Swirl
2010-08-21 9:54 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-08-21 10:47 ` Blue Swirl
2010-08-21 12:24 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-08-21 14:03 ` Blue Swirl
2010-08-22 16:49 ` Jes Sorensen
2010-08-22 17:00 ` malc
2010-08-22 18:32 ` Blue Swirl
2010-08-22 18:35 ` malc
2010-08-23 8:02 ` Jes Sorensen
2010-08-23 14:07 ` john cooper
2010-08-22 18:18 ` Blue Swirl
2010-08-22 18:36 ` malc
2010-08-22 18:42 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-08-22 20:03 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-23 8:33 ` Kevin Wolf
2010-08-23 13:52 ` Jes Sorensen
2010-08-24 12:34 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-08-22 18:41 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-08-22 18:56 ` Blue Swirl
2010-08-22 19:28 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-08-22 19:44 ` malc
2010-08-22 19:50 ` Blue Swirl
2010-08-22 20:28 ` malc
2010-08-22 20:39 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-23 13:55 ` Jes Sorensen
2010-08-23 14:03 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-23 14:07 ` Jes Sorensen
2010-08-23 14:15 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-22 19:47 ` Blue Swirl
2010-08-22 20:09 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-22 20:15 ` Blue Swirl
2010-08-22 20:17 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-08-22 20:41 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-23 7:17 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2010-08-22 16:40 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jes Sorensen
2010-08-22 18:13 ` Blue Swirl
2010-08-22 18:39 ` malc
2010-08-23 8:14 ` Jes Sorensen
2010-08-23 14:04 ` john cooper
2010-08-23 8:09 ` Jes Sorensen [this message]
2010-08-22 20:12 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-22 20:16 ` Blue Swirl
2010-08-22 20:43 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-23 11:01 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-08-23 11:07 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-17 18:51 ` Blue Swirl
2010-08-13 17:52 ` Blue Swirl
2010-08-13 20:54 ` malc
2010-08-15 14:04 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C722CC4.9080606@redhat.com \
--to=jes.sorensen@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=miguel.filho@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).