From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51692 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OnXsR-0003HG-SS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:19:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OnXsQ-000866-Ra for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:19:55 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:5602) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OnXsQ-00085t-KA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:19:54 -0400 Message-ID: <4C72809F.7040108@john-cooper.org> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:07:27 -0400 From: john cooper MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] CODING_STYLE amendments References: <4C6A4291.1020105@redhat.com> <4C6A8CD8.2080701@codemonkey.ws> <4C71550F.6080602@redhat.com> <4C722B10.4050303@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4C722B10.4050303@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jes Sorensen Cc: john cooper , Markus Armbruster , qemu-devel , Blue Swirl , Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho Jes Sorensen wrote: > On 08/22/10 20:35, malc wrote: >> On Sun, 22 Aug 2010, Blue Swirl wrote: >>> What's the ultimate editor? I'd love to drop Emacs, which is annoying >>> but does its job better than the others that I've tried. >>> >> ed > > ed is for sissies, real developers use cat, echo, and sed..... I prefer teco -- its smaller footprint consumes far less core. I find this also improves user interactivity on a heavily loaded system when swapping to drum. -john $$