From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51759 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OnYJE-000679-SQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:47:39 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1OnYDn-0003U2-9F
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:42:00 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:6164)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1OnYDn-0003Tw-35
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:41:59 -0400
Message-ID: <4C7288BC.9000804@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:42:04 +0200
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] fat_chksum(): fix access above array bounds
References: <1282430843-32308-1-git-send-email-loic.minier@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <1282430843-32308-1-git-send-email-loic.minier@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: =?UTF-8?B?TG/Dr2MgTWluaWVy?= <loic.minier@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Am 22.08.2010 00:47, schrieb Lo=C3=AFc Minier:
> Signed-off-by: Lo=C3=AFc Minier <loic.minier@linaro.org>

Thanks, applied to the block patch.

How did you find this one? From a quick look it seems that the pattern
that name is intentionally overflowed to access extension is still there
in some places. So if this caused some real bug, I think we'll have to
fix the other ones, too.

Kevin