From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39865 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OoLy0-0004HD-OO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 15:49:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OoLxs-0002zZ-Mn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 15:48:53 -0400 Received: from mail-qw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.216.45]:57922) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OoLxs-0002zU-Kf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 15:48:52 -0400 Received: by qwh5 with SMTP id 5so888744qwh.4 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:48:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C7573A2.8030708@codemonkey.ws> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:48:50 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm faster that qemu? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: walt Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 08/25/2010 02:37 PM, walt wrote: > Hi qemu team, > > I just discovered that qemu now offers kvm support, so I decided to > compare it to qemu-kvm. > > I'm running the latest git versions of both programs on an AMD64 > host running the latest kernel from Linus.git. > > The guest is Windows 7 on a qcow2 disk image and one kvm64 cpu. > > Using the same qcow2 image for both qemu and qemu-kvm, I find that > qemu-kvm boots to the Win7 login prompt in 25 seconds, but qemu > with kvm enabled takes about 45 seconds. make sure you build qemu with --enable-io-thread. Also, what's your full command line? Regards, Anthony Liguori > > Is this an expected outcome, or must I be doing something wrong > with qemu? > > BTW, I tried reverting the qcow2 patch being discussed in another > thread but it made no difference. Perhaps there's not much writing > to disk during bootup? > > Thanks! > > > > >