From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52145 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oob4a-00061z-2A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 07:56:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oob4Z-0004TE-1n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 07:56:47 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58404) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oob4Y-0004T3-Qa for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 07:56:47 -0400 Message-ID: <4C76567A.9030800@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:56:42 +0300 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm faster than qemu? References: <4C7573A2.8030708@codemonkey.ws> <4C75A736.80005@codemonkey.ws> <4C761D77.4090206@redhat.com> <20100826075921.GR10499@redhat.com> <4C763B05.9040107@redhat.com> <20100826102507.GS10499@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20100826102507.GS10499@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gleb Natapov Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, walt , Alexander Graf , Gerd Hoffmann On 08/26/2010 01:25 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > >> Isn't that only required on SVM? >> > No, old vmx too. > 'flexpriority' in /proc/cpuinfo means tpr patching is unnecessary. But to use flexpriority you need in-kernel irqchip, so qemu.git will be slow even if you have it. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function