From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
agl@us.ibm.com, qemu list <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2] balloon: Don't try fetching info if machine is stopped
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 08:22:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C766A97.4030107@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100826081425.GD9564@redhat.com>
On 08/26/2010 03:14 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:05:44AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>> On 08/26/2010 08:05 AM, Amit Shah wrote:
>>
>>> This is what I have currently. It would need some timer handling in
>>> the save/load case as well, right?
>>>
>> When loading you won't have any pending "info balloon" command, so I
>> think the timer need not be preserved across migration.
>>
>> Also, 5 seconds for a stopped guest is actually a lot, so maybe Amit's
>> original patch or a variant thereof would make sense anyway.
>>
> We should have a combination of both. If we know the guest is stopped
> we should return immediately, otherwise we should use the timer as a
> way to cope with a crashed/evil guest.
>
Stopped doesn't necessarily mean that it's permanently stopped or even
that a user has stopped it.
We stop a guest during live migration and in some other cases (like on
disk error).
Returning immediately is an optimization on something that should be a
proper fix. Otherwise, you have a guest initiated DoS attack on
management tools.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> Daniel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-26 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-20 0:48 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2] balloon: Don't try fetching info if machine is stopped Amit Shah
2010-08-20 10:13 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2010-08-20 12:01 ` [Qemu-devel] " Amit Shah
2010-08-22 21:54 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-08-23 9:24 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2010-08-26 5:25 ` Amit Shah
2010-08-26 6:05 ` Amit Shah
2010-08-26 8:05 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-08-26 8:14 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2010-08-26 13:22 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2010-08-26 8:17 ` Amit Shah
2010-08-26 8:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-08-26 8:28 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2010-08-26 12:57 ` Luiz Capitulino
2010-08-26 13:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C766A97.4030107@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).