From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu list <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
agl@us.ibm.com, Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] qerror: Add a new MACHINE_STOPPED error message
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 09:59:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C77D2EB.1030306@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100827111507.5278eba3@doriath>
On 08/27/2010 09:15 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>
> I wondered if we could drop it for now to make it right in 0.14, but I
> believe it's already part of the user monitor for some time and libvirt
> uses the stats, right?
>
> I think we need testing/unstable namespace in QMP, where commands can be
> tested for while so that we reduce the risk of nasty surprises like this one.
>
It's trying to plug a sieve with a band-aid. It's certainly an
"improvement" but it's of question utility looking at the bigger picture.
Balloon is a perfect example of where what we really need to do is build
interface interfaces that make sense, and then expose them in QMP.
What's a reasonable C-level API to query statistics that potentially may
never return? Building in a timeout is something of a crappy API
because it puts policy deep in the API that is trivial to implement
elsewhere. What you'd probably do is something like:
BalloonStatsRequest *query_guest_balloon_stats(CompletionCallback *cb,
void *opaque);
int cancel_guest_balloon_stats(BalloonStatsRequest *req);
void release_guest_balloon_stats(BalloonStatsRequest *req);
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
>>
>>> Beyond fixing that regression, I agree that this command is terminally
>>> flawed& we need to deprecate it& provide better specified new
>>> replacement(s). This seems like 0.14 work to me though.
>>>
>> Yup.
>>
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>> [1] I know that they could already suffer if there was a bug in qemu
>>> that prevented it responding, even if the guest was not being
>>> malicious/crashed.
>>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-27 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-27 5:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/3] virtio-balloon: Don't wait indefinitely for guest response Amit Shah
2010-08-27 5:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/3] balloon: Don't try fetching info if guest is unresponsive Amit Shah
2010-08-27 5:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/3] qerror: Add a new MACHINE_STOPPED error message Amit Shah
2010-08-27 9:29 ` [Qemu-devel] " Daniel P. Berrange
2010-08-27 12:39 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-08-27 12:58 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2010-08-27 13:59 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-08-27 14:15 ` Luiz Capitulino
2010-08-27 14:59 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2010-08-27 15:33 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2010-08-27 15:45 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-08-27 16:08 ` Luiz Capitulino
2010-08-27 19:02 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-08-27 19:24 ` Luiz Capitulino
2010-08-27 19:37 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-08-27 20:58 ` Luiz Capitulino
2010-08-30 14:52 ` Should QMP be RPC to internal C interfaces? (was: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] qerror: Add a new MACHINE_STOPPED error message) Markus Armbruster
2010-08-30 15:28 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: Should QMP be RPC to internal C interfaces? Anthony Liguori
2010-08-30 15:38 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-08-30 16:16 ` Luiz Capitulino
2010-08-30 16:26 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-08-31 12:48 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-08-31 12:58 ` Luiz Capitulino
2010-08-31 13:05 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-08-31 8:47 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-08-31 13:03 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-08-28 0:52 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] qerror: Add a new MACHINE_STOPPED error message Amit Shah
2010-08-30 8:30 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-08-30 13:06 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-08-30 15:01 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-08-30 19:17 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Disable virtio-balloon memory stats interface Adam Litke
2010-08-31 3:42 ` [Qemu-devel] " Amit Shah
2010-09-08 10:57 ` Amit Shah
2010-08-27 5:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/3] balloon: Don't try fetching info if machine is stopped Amit Shah
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C77D2EB.1030306@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).