qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: walt <w41ter@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm faster than qemu?
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:02:47 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C7A7697.3060407@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <i56o0g$b27$1@dough.gmane.org>

  On 08/27/2010 12:57 AM, walt wrote:
>
>> Also try qemu-kvm with -no-kvm-irqchip. I can't believe an in-kernel 
>> lapic would make this much of a difference with windows 7 but it's 
>> worth trying.
>
> Using that flag wipes out the difference entirely:  both come in at 
> about 65 seconds.
>
> I also tried xp-32 running on the same two kvm64 virtual machines, 
> with slightly
> different results:
>
> qemu-kvm:  35 seconds (65 seconds using -no-kvm-irqchip, a huge 
> disadvantage)
> qemu:      58 seconds
>
> Anything unexpected in these results?

Looks like kernel irqchip is the cause for the difference, which isn't 
too surprising.


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

      reply	other threads:[~2010-08-29 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-25 19:37 [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm faster that qemu? walt
2010-08-25 19:48 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-08-25 23:09   ` [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm faster than qemu? walt
2010-08-25 23:28     ` Anthony Liguori
2010-08-26  7:53       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2010-08-26  7:59         ` Gleb Natapov
2010-08-26  9:59           ` Gerd Hoffmann
2010-08-26 10:24             ` Alexander Graf
2010-08-26 10:25               ` Gleb Natapov
2010-08-26 11:56                 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-26 12:54           ` Anthony Liguori
2010-08-26 12:57             ` Gleb Natapov
2010-08-26 21:57       ` walt
2010-08-29 15:02         ` Avi Kivity [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C7A7697.3060407@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=w41ter@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).