From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42597 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oq47L-0003yt-MN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:09:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oq47J-0000kT-Qh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:09:43 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.213.45]:35387) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oq47J-0000kF-MP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:09:41 -0400 Received: by ywa6 with SMTP id 6so2351692ywa.4 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 06:09:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C7BAC83.4000004@codemonkey.ws> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 08:05:07 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/5] RFC: distinguish warm reset from cold reset. References: <4C7B64D7.2020703@redhat.com> <20100830083520.GA7402@valinux.co.jp> <20100830111909.GC10499@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20100830111909.GC10499@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gleb Natapov Cc: glommer@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, blauwirbel@gmail.com, Isaku Yamahata , alex.williamson@redhat.com, Avi Kivity On 08/30/2010 06:19 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > Why stop there. Why not implement proper power planes support. Some > devices are not powered down on S3/S4 suspend for instance. > What feature would it give us? The mapping of D-state to S-state is defined by the ACPI tables, no? So we're in total control of whether we would ever do this and I can't see the advantage of doing it. Regards, Anthony Liguori > -- > Gleb. > >