From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49670 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oq9d7-0003k6-Ds
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:02:55 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1Oq9d4-00087K-5O
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:02:53 -0400
Received: from mail-qy0-f180.google.com ([209.85.216.180]:50867)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1Oq9d4-000879-2f
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:02:50 -0400
Received: by qyk31 with SMTP id 31so5584200qyk.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C7C0059.5040005@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:02:49 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 00/10] initial spice support.
References: <1282903199-30669-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com>	<AANLkTinsNmFSYh2TDwwAxg80TTqCfK92ijM8n9DA_PTL@mail.gmail.com>	<4C7B705E.60404@redhat.com>
	<AANLkTikJbOaE-8q_NcX9Z60t2ssGCasnqm4dj-c5OVkb@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikJbOaE-8q_NcX9Z60t2ssGCasnqm4dj-c5OVkb@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 08/30/2010 01:58 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>
> Wilful misconduct? May I ask if there are other things that you don't
> agree with and you are covertly working against?
>    

:-)

Braces should be used.  The discussion was about enforcing coding style 
at commit time and reformatting code.

But for the most part, people agree that we want braces to be used on 
single line ifs.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori