From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42861 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OqQqr-0000x2-L0
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:26:18 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1OqQqj-0007z1-5a
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:26:12 -0400
Received: from mail-gy0-f173.google.com ([209.85.160.173]:57451)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1OqQqj-0007yj-28
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:26:05 -0400
Received: by gya1 with SMTP id 1so2980414gya.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 06:26:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C7D02FB.4030706@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:26:19 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 5/5] RFC: distinguish warm reset from
	cold reset.
References: <cover.1283152674.git.yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
	<0a460e01cca4fa24f446c7a715fe6df17d0be9ed.1283152674.git.yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
	<4C7BAB2A.30608@codemonkey.ws>
	<20100831025808.GA19374@valinux.co.jp>
	<4C7CFEC1.8040204@codemonkey.ws>
	<20100831131449.GG10499@redhat.com>
	<4C7D01B3.4030602@codemonkey.ws>
	<20100831132158.GH10499@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100831132158.GH10499@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: glommer@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, blauwirbel@gmail.com, Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>, alex.williamson@redhat.com, avi@redhat.com

On 08/31/2010 08:21 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 08:20:51AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>    
>> On 08/31/2010 08:14 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>      
>>> System_reset should do cold reset like it does now.
>>>        
>> Why?
>>
>>      
> Because I should not be forced to restart qemu to bring devices to
> initial state.
>    

IOW, you use system_reset for debugging purposes to reset the device model.

Point taken but functionally speaking, system_reset should map to a 
RESET signal and from what I can tell in this thread, that's a warm reset.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> --
> 			Gleb.
>