From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36343 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OsHSI-0002ju-Op for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 11:48:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OsHSH-000837-Ki for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 11:48:30 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f45.google.com ([209.85.161.45]:39560) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OsHSH-00082z-GA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 11:48:29 -0400 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so2360264fxm.4 for ; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 08:48:28 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <4C83B7C4.2070903@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2010 17:31:16 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4C62825A.6000903@mail.berlios.de> <4C685F5D.2090707@codemonkey.ws> <4C69A29F.5000606@codemonkey.ws> <4C6AE96C.2040907@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Unmaintained QEMU builds List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: Blue Swirl , QEMU Developers On 08/18/2010 11:46 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: >>> I think a better question would be, should we even bother with >>> thread wrappers? If we drop win32 support, we can just assume >>> pthreads and avoid a layer of indirection. > > The current threading code is also broken on osx and last time I > talked to paolo, his patch should also fix things for osx. Hm, really? :) That's news to me. :) But maybe I don't remember some detail. > So in the end it doesn't seem like a bad idea to support win32 - it's > feature set is about the least common dominator between all OSs we > support. [...] And wrt vnc and threading, I'm fully in for > deprecating the non-threaded version. Platforms that don't work with > threading get no VNC server. Yeah, that was my motivation for writing the Win32 wrappers (and the io-thread too, but that's longer-term). Paolo