From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50321 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ot1Va-0005PK-As for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:58:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ot1F5-0004vV-20 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:41:59 -0400 Received: from e9.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.139]:49247) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ot1F4-0004pb-W8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:41:55 -0400 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e9.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o87GNI2Z028592 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 12:23:18 -0400 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o87GfnXF079646 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 12:41:50 -0400 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o87GfnH8008178 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 10:41:49 -0600 Message-ID: <4C866B4A.6070204@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 09:41:46 -0700 From: "Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)" MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20100826043937.GA2777@c3sl.ufpr.br> <4C7699F0.3050600@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20100904040125.GA4213@c3sl.ufpr.br> In-Reply-To: <20100904040125.GA4213@c3sl.ufpr.br> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: virtio-9p error List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Bruno Cesar Ribas Cc: V9FS Developers , Anthony Liguori , Qemu-development List , kvm-devel Bruno Cesar Ribas wrote: > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:44:32AM -0700, Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV) wrote: >> Bruno Cesar Ribas wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >> [snip] >> This quick test is with QEMU patches that are on mailing lists but not merged >> into mainline. >> Being said that, I don't think they really affect this. > > is there any work to bring these patches to mainline? > > There's no imprevement on virtio-9p in qemu since my first email. I sent a new revision on Thursday. I am expecting that they will go in anytime. Last time I talked to Anthony, he is planning on taking these patches soon. Thanks, JV > >>> [snip] >