From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46478 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ov8lJ-00016y-L3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:07:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ov8lI-0008EH-HV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:07:57 -0400 Received: from mail-gy0-f173.google.com ([209.85.160.173]:34824) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ov8lI-0008EA-E4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:07:56 -0400 Received: by gya1 with SMTP id 1so2443755gya.4 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 06:07:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C8E2229.90502@codemonkey.ws> Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 08:07:53 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] qed: Add QEMU Enhanced Disk format References: <1283767478-16740-1-git-send-email-stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4C84E738.3020802@codemonkey.ws> <4C865187.6090508@redhat.com> <4C865CFE.7010508@codemonkey.ws> <4C8663C4.1090508@redhat.com> <4C866773.2030103@codemonkey.ws> <4C86BC6B.5010809@codemonkey.ws> <4C874812.9090807@redhat.com> <4C87860A.3060904@codemonkey.ws> <4C888287.8020209@redhat.com> <4C88D7CC.5000806@codemonkey.ws> <4C8A1311.8070903@redhat.com> <4C8A2F40.7000509@codemonkey.ws> <4C8A36D4.5050001@redhat.com> <4C8A4707.7080705@codemonkey.ws> <4C8A5391.2030601@redhat.com> <4C8A65BB.9010602@codemonkey.ws> <4C8CD47E.4060309@redhat.com> <4C8CEE14.4020501@codemonkey.ws> <4C8CF812.4020203@redhat.com> <4C8E04EA.4090704@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4C8E04EA.4090704@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Avi Kivity , Stefan Hajnoczi On 09/13/2010 06:03 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > The real reason why it's not the same story is that a qcow3 would be > backwards compatible. Old images would just work as qcow3 by changing > the version number in the header. Even if they are on a block device. > Even if they are encrypted. Even if they are compressed. Even if they > have internal snapshots. > I think that's really the point of QED. I think the features of qcow2 make it prohibitively difficult to achieve correctness and good peformance. > We would have just one driver instead of two, and we could tell people > the upgrade their images and they didn't have to care about feature loss. > If the features don't work correctly, is it really feature loss? Regards, Anthony Liguori > Kevin >