From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37662 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OyPap-0001Am-2P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:42:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OyPak-0006gu-Kg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:42:38 -0400 Received: from mail-qy0-f173.google.com ([209.85.216.173]:40969) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OyPak-0006go-IQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:42:34 -0400 Received: by qyk33 with SMTP id 33so641967qyk.4 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 06:42:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C9A07AC.9070603@codemonkey.ws> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 08:42:04 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4C911D8F.1060406@codemonkey.ws> <4C97A73C.4070102@codemonkey.ws> <4C97C255.2020106@codemonkey.ws> <4C9A073A.2050009@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4C9A073A.2050009@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Win2k host problem with {get, free}{addr, name}info() List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Blue Swirl , qemu-devel On 09/22/2010 08:40 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 09/21/2010 08:32 PM, Blue Swirl wrote: >> Sort of, gnulib needs some configuration before use. I made some hacks >> to avoid that and also suppressed warnings by overriding QEMU_CFLAGS, >> but it's getting ugly. >> >> Actually, there's no 'configure' in gnulib HEAD even though >> docs/INSTALL mentions that. Strange. > > gnulib's docs/INSTALL is a template for packages using autotools, it's > not for gnulib itself. > >> Is it possible to apply local patches to a submodule tree? > > It is not needed; to explain this, you need to go one step back. > > gnulib's submodule is never built directly. It only lives in the > build tree so that it can be consulted by gnulib-tool, but it doesn't > even make it to the release tarballs. Instead, gnulib-tool should be > invoked after checking out superproject.git, and copies selected > gnulib files into superproject's checkout (these files are .gitignore'd). > > Now, gnulib-tool also take care of applying patches to the files it > copies, so the correct question is "is it possible to apply local > patches to gnulib files" and the answer is "yes". > > That said, as much as I am a fan of autotools, I think using gnulib > within qemu would be a big mess. If someone was willing to put in the effort, I'd be very supportive of moving QEMU to autotools. Regards, Anthony Liguori > Paolo