From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34033 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OySJE-0001Zu-Qq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:36:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OySJD-0001Yn-O1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:36:40 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:32023) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OySJD-0001Yf-Gc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:36:39 -0400 Message-ID: <4C9A307C.70004@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 18:36:12 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Win2k host problem with {get, free}{addr, name}info() References: <4C911D8F.1060406@codemonkey.ws> <4C97A73C.4070102@codemonkey.ws> <4C97C255.2020106@codemonkey.ws> <4C9A073A.2050009@redhat.com> <4C9A07AC.9070603@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: malc Cc: Blue Swirl , qemu-devel On 09/22/2010 05:27 PM, malc wrote: > On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> If someone was willing to put in the effort, I'd be very supportive of moving >> QEMU to autotools. > > And i'll be against it. This somehow doesn't surprise me. Anyway, what do you think about the idea of making the command-line of QEMU configure more autoconfy? Paolo