From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37617 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OyUAv-0002nb-6x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:36:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OyUAu-0000UL-00 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:36:13 -0400 Received: from mail-qy0-f180.google.com ([209.85.216.180]:57001) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OyUAt-0000UE-T1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:36:11 -0400 Received: by qyk5 with SMTP id 5so1154657qyk.4 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:36:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C9A4C77.2080806@codemonkey.ws> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:35:35 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] BUG - qdev - partial loss of network connectivity References: <20100922171832.GA28721@moo.pl> <4C9A3FAF.9090503@codemonkey.ws> <20100922182049.GA29263@moo.pl> In-Reply-To: <20100922182049.GA29263@moo.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Leszek Urbanski Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 09/22/2010 01:20 PM, Leszek Urbanski wrote: > <4C9A3FAF.9090503@codemonkey.ws>; from Anthony Liguori on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:41:03 -0500 > > >> Is the guest kernel vanilla 2.6.32.22 or is it a distro kernel? If the >> later, what distro? >> >> The difference in the two invocations is that with the -device syntax, >> you're getting offload features enabled. >> > It's vanilla 2.6.32.22, but I also reproduced this on Debian's 2.6.32-23 > (based on 2.6.32.21). > > If offload is the only difference, I'll play with different offload > options and check which one causes it. > It's not technically the only difference but it's the most likely culprit IMHO. Regards, Anthony Liguori