From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35972 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P5Qei-0003U5-Fv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:15:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P5Qee-0007Te-H6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:15:37 -0400 Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.143]:53624) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P5Qee-0007TL-Eg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:15:36 -0400 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e3.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o9BLx0f3008224 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 17:59:00 -0400 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o9BMFXqL456560 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:15:33 -0400 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o9BMFWMZ001159 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 16:15:32 -0600 Message-ID: <4CB38C82.1090403@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 17:15:30 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] [RFT] qemu 0.13.0-rc3 List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel , Blue Swirl , Aurelien Jarno , Kevin Wolf , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Juan Quintela , Luiz Capitulino , Marcelo Tosatti After suffering from a prolonged maintainer softlockup, I'm attempting to get 0.13.0 release process back on track. I've tagged qemu-0.13.0-rc3 in git which only carries a few changes since 0.13.0-rc1. Most notably, a series of updates from Kevin Wolf and Cam Macdonell's ivshmem device. I think we're pretty good testing wise for the final release but I wanted to offer a 24-hour window for last minute fixes. I'm only interested in the following: 1) Patches that are *tested* against the stable-0.13 branch that are already committed in master. Please tell me explicitly that you've tested the patch and how you've tested it. 2) Pull requests from other maintainers with cherry-picked patches against stable-0.13 that have been tested. If you don't already have something ready, it's probably not worth worrying about. We can follow with 0.13.1 in a relatively short period of time. So please get any requests to me before 6PM US Central time October 12th. Post 0.13.0, as part of the 0.14 planning, we can discuss how to avoid future delay with releases. Thanks! Regards, Anthony Liguori