From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35632 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P5hhZ-0003LN-Vn
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:27:47 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <weil@mail.berlios.de>) id 1P5hhY-0002cb-Qk
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:27:45 -0400
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:59231)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <weil@mail.berlios.de>) id 1P5hhY-0002cV-F2
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:27:44 -0400
Message-ID: <4CB48C63.2010202@mail.berlios.de>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:27:15 +0200
From: Stefan Weil <weil@mail.berlios.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFT] qemu 0.13.0-rc3
References: <4CB38C82.1090403@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CB38C82.1090403@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>, Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>

Am 12.10.2010 00:15, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> After suffering from a prolonged maintainer softlockup, I'm attempting 
> to get 0.13.0 release process back on track.
>
> I've tagged qemu-0.13.0-rc3 in git which only carries a few changes 
> since 0.13.0-rc1.  Most notably, a series of updates from Kevin Wolf 
> and Cam Macdonell's ivshmem device.
>
> I think we're pretty good testing wise for the final release but I 
> wanted to offer a 24-hour window for last minute fixes.  I'm only 
> interested in the following:
>
> 1) Patches that are *tested* against the stable-0.13 branch that are 
> already committed in master.  Please tell me explicitly that you've 
> tested the patch and how you've tested it.
>
> 2) Pull requests from other maintainers with cherry-picked patches 
> against stable-0.13 that have been tested.
>
> If you don't already have something ready, it's probably not worth 
> worrying about.  We can follow with 0.13.1 in a relatively short 
> period of time.
>
> So please get any requests to me before 6PM US Central time October 12th.
>
> Post 0.13.0, as part of the 0.14 planning, we can discuss how to avoid 
> future delay with releases.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori
>
>

Michael's last PCI pull request ([PULL] eeepro100, virtio, net, vhost fixes)
was proposed for master and for 0.13, too.

I tested the patch 010ec6293409f10b88631c36145944b9c3277ce1
"eepro100: Add support for multiple individual addresses (multiple IA))"
and suggest to include it.

Regards,
Stefan Weil