From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Weil <weil@mail.berlios.de>
Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] pci: Automatically patch PCI device id in PCI ROM
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:54:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CBC3572.6000908@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CBC2C7A.4000803@mail.berlios.de>
Hi,
> As far as I know there is no well-defined checksum offset.
> The checksum is simply set by modifying any byte (which
> normally should be unused).
>
> Etherboot has some unused bytes at the beginning of rom data
> and always uses the same offset 6.
Ah, so you don't actually update the checksum but change some unused
byte to make the checksum stay the same, right?
> For other roms which also don't use the byte at offset 6, this approach
> will work, too. If they store code or vital data at that location,
> we destroy that data, so it won't work.
>
> The VGA bios roms have a sequence of several bytes of zero
> starting at offset 6, so maybe this data is not important and
> we may change the byte at offset 6, but that should be checked
> before using this mechanism.
From vgabios:
.org 0
vgabios_start:
.byte 0x55, 0xaa /* BIOS signature */
.byte 0x40 /* BIOS extension length */
vgabios_entry_point:
jmp vgabios_init_func
From seabios:
struct rom_header {
u16 signature;
u8 size;
u8 initVector[4];
u8 reserved[17];
u16 pcioffset;
u16 pnpoffset;
} PACKED;
Hmm. So offset 6 is the last byte of initVector. If (and only if) you
happen to know that the jump instruction takes 3 bytes only it is save
to modify the unused 4th byte. Seems to be true for both vgabios and
etherboot/gPXE. We can't assume this in general, although it is quite
likely given that there hardly would be anything but a 16bit jump.
> As long as the driver specifies the romfile name,
> we get an implicitly defined behaviour: either the
> rom matches and nothing special is done, or it doesn't
> and the id(s) will be fixed.
> So neither flag nor opt-in seems to be needed.
When following this argumentation the vendor id sanity check shouldn't
be there in the first place ;)
Note that romfile is a pci bus property, so it isn't fully under the
drivers control because it can be overridden from the command line for
every pci device.
cheers,
Gerd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-18 11:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-12 12:41 [Qemu-devel] Where's gpxe-eepro100-80862449.rom ? Markus Armbruster
2010-10-12 16:18 ` [Qemu-devel] " Stefan Weil
2010-10-13 7:13 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-10-15 20:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] pci: Automatically patch PCI device id in PCI ROM Stefan Weil
2010-10-15 21:05 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-10-18 10:09 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2010-10-18 18:39 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-10-21 10:09 ` [SeaBIOS] " Avi Kivity
2010-10-21 13:14 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-10-21 15:34 ` Avi Kivity
2010-10-18 10:04 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2010-10-18 11:16 ` Stefan Weil
2010-10-18 11:54 ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]
2010-10-18 13:16 ` Stefan Weil
2010-10-18 13:30 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2010-10-18 15:50 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2010-10-18 17:54 ` Stefan Weil
2010-10-18 17:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] pci: Automatically patch PCI vendor id and " Stefan Weil
2010-10-18 17:58 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-10-18 18:42 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-10-18 19:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-10-18 19:36 ` Stefan Weil
2010-10-18 19:59 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-10-19 6:40 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2010-10-18 19:56 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-10-18 18:44 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2010-10-18 18:53 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-10-18 19:11 ` Stefan Weil
2010-10-19 8:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-10-19 21:15 ` Stefan Weil
2010-10-19 21:22 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-10-19 21:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-10-19 21:08 ` Stefan Weil
2010-10-20 7:19 ` [Qemu-devel] " Gerd Hoffmann
2010-10-20 20:30 ` Stefan Weil
2010-11-22 6:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-10-15 20:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] eepro100: Use a single rom file for all i825xx devices Stefan Weil
2010-11-22 6:29 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-10-15 21:03 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: Where's gpxe-eepro100-80862449.rom ? Stefan Weil
2010-10-25 12:11 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-10-25 16:23 ` Stefan Weil
2010-10-25 16:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-15 17:06 ` Stefan Weil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CBC3572.6000908@redhat.com \
--to=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=weil@mail.berlios.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).