From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42191 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P8U6z-00077U-Jq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 04:33:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8Tzg-0003eV-Mh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 04:25:57 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f45.google.com ([209.85.161.45]:51912) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8Tzg-0003eK-EO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 04:25:56 -0400 Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so2667839fxm.4 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 01:25:55 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <4CBEA790.9050208@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:25:52 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes for Oct 19 References: <20101019151441.GA24673@x200.localdomain> <4DE00079-05FA-40DF-9EA5-9573AD745117@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <4DE00079-05FA-40DF-9EA5-9573AD745117@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: Chris Wright , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org On 10/20/2010 10:21 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: > Would it be realistic to declare deprecating the qemu-kvm fork for > 0.14 as goal? I recall some performance problems with the qemu.git iothread, I'm not sure all of those have been fixed. Paolo