From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38861 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P8WDB-0003Y3-Gg
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 06:48:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1P8WDA-0004s6-4t
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 06:48:01 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:6087)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1P8WD9-0004rx-TE
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 06:48:00 -0400
Message-ID: <4CBEC8DA.1010403@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:47:54 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes for Oct 19
References: <20101019151441.GA24673@x200.localdomain>
	<4DE00079-05FA-40DF-9EA5-9573AD745117@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <4DE00079-05FA-40DF-9EA5-9573AD745117@suse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org

  On 10/20/2010 10:21 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 19.10.2010, at 17:14, Chris Wright wrote:
>
> >  0.13.X -stable
> >  - Anthony will send note to qemu-devel on this
> >  - move 0.13.X -stable to a separate tree
> >  - driven independently of main qemu tree
> >  - challenge is always in the porting and testing of backported fixes
> >  - looking for volunteers
> >
> >  0.14
> >  - would like to do this before end of the year
> >  - 0.13 forked off a while back (~July),
> >  - 0.14 features
> >   - QMP stabilized
> >     - 0.13.0 ->  0.14 QMP
> >     - hard attempt not to break compatibility
> >     - new commands, rework, async, human monitor passthrough
> >     - goal getting to libvirt not needing human monitor at all
> >     - QMP KVM autotest test suite submitted
> >  - in-kernel apic, tpr patching still outstanding
> >  - QED coroutine concurrency
>
> Would it be realistic to declare deprecating the qemu-kvm fork for 0.14 as goal?

For general use perhaps, device assignment might need another cycle.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function