From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60866 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P9I3z-0008W0-Vn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:53:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P9I3y-0005ZN-3b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:53:43 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:19059) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P9I3x-0005Yz-Tc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:53:42 -0400 Received: from int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9MDre8P007345 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:53:41 -0400 Message-ID: <4CC19763.6010501@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:53:39 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] First part of autoconfy series: cleanup tests/ References: <1287649120-30740-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20101022112634.72b672df@doriath> <4CC193DA.50904@redhat.com> <20101022114455.255d9a75@doriath> In-Reply-To: <20101022114455.255d9a75@doriath> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Luiz Capitulino Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 10/22/2010 03:44 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > > We could also have check-i386, check-qmp, etc. and check would simply > > call all of them. > > That would be perfect, I think. I mean, if we could stick only to check > to do all our unit-testing Well, the current "make test" is more integration testing than unit testing, so I'm not sure check can work for that. But autotest can, which is why I mentioned it. Paolo